Ecovacs T30S Vs Eufy X10 Pro Omni: Which Is Better?

Today’s head-to-head comparison pits two best-selling robots against each other—the Ecovacs T30S and the Eufy X10 Pro Omni. Both of these models are vacuum and mop combos in the middle price range, putting them in a similar “weight class,” so to speak. After purchasing them for ourselves, we tested them with our full battery of Vacuum Wars tests.

In this comparison review, we will run these bots through seven rounds of official Vacuum Wars tests, adding up the points after every round to declare the winner at the end. 

Round 1: Features and Specs

Both robots navigate with LiDAR and automatically empty their dustbins into bagged docks. And while both robots wash their mop-pads and dry them with hot air, the Ecovacs washes its mops in hot water for increased sanitation.

They use the same style of dual spinning mop-pads we see on many mid-range and premium robot models, and they both lift their mop pads when they sense carpets to prevent them from getting wet. This important automation allows the robots to vacuum and mop a mix of hard floors and carpet in the same cleaning run.  

But Ecovacs has an edge on Eufy in mopping, as the T30S extends one of its mop-pads sideways to reach into edges.

Their apps are nearly identical—multi‑floor maps, room‑by‑room settings, virtual barriers, and voice‑assistant control. Ecovacs has another slight edge over Eufy in this area, with options to mop with the grain of hard floors to minimize streaking among other small differences.

Round 1 Winner: Ecovacs

Both robots are above average in their features scores, but when we add the numbers, the Ecovacs T30S is the clear winner with a score of 4.3 points. The X10 Pro clocks in with 3.8 points.

Feature / Capability	Eufy X10 Pro Omni	Ecovacs T30S	Why it matters / Notes
LiDAR Navigation	✔	✔	Accurate room mapping & straight-line cleaning paths
Auto-Empty Dock	✔ (bagged)	✔ (bagged)	Hands-off dust disposal; 3 L bags on both
Mop-Pad Type	Dual 180 RPM spinners	Dual 180 RPM spinners	Same hardware foundation
Mop-Pad Lift	10 mm	10 mm	Keeps carpets dry during mixed runs
Edge-Reach Mop	No	Yes – pad extends sideways	Ecovacs can scrub right up to baseboards
Pad-Wash Water	Room-temp	Hot-water wash (~140 °F)	Hotter rinse helps sanitize pads
Pad Drying	Hot-air	Hot-air	Both reduce odor / mildew
App Features	Multi-floor maps, virtual barriers, voice control	Same features plus “mop-with-grain” option	Ecovacs offers finer control to reduce streaks

Round 2: Mopping

Round Two moves to mopping. In our dried‑on stain test, Ecovacs scores an impressive 119 points—higher than the category average of 93 points—while Eufy’s  X10 manages a somewhat poor score of 60.

If you caught our earlier review of the X10, you may remember that its mopping was formerly more impressive. But after follow‑up tests, its performance started to be inconsistent. The main issue was that the amount of water it used became erratic. Sometimes it used too little water to clean stains, and sometimes it used way too much water, which left streaks, and it didn’t matter which water setting we used. 

This costs Eufy’s X10 a significant points deduction, which is why this mopping score sits below our initial assessment. 

Round 2 Winner: Ecovacs

Ecovacs mops up with a score of 3.7, well above our average score of 2.7, while Eufy X10 falls below average at 2.3, a big loss for the X10.

Mopping Feature / Metric	Ecovacs T30 S	Eufy X10 Pro	Category Avg
Overall Mop Score	3.72	2.29	2.73
Dried-Stain Test (pts)	119	60	93
Mop-Pad Type & Speed	2 spinning pads, 180 RPM	2 spinning pads, 180 RPM	–
Mop-Pad Lift (mm)	Yes, 10.9 mm	Yes, 10.9 mm	–
Adjustable Water Levels	Yes (3)	Yes (3)	–
Downward Pressure	Yes, 6 N (≈1.34 lb)	Yes, 9.8 N (≈2.2 lb)	–
Extending Mop Pad	Yes	No (does have an edge-cleaning ‘swing’ feature)	–
Clean Along Floor Direction	Yes	No	–
Water Residue Score (g left behind)	.75	1.5	1.01

Round 3: Obstacle Avoidance

For Obstacle Avoidance, Ecovacs uses dual lasers and a 3‑D structured‑light system for its obstacle avoidance, while Eufy relies on its RGB camera with an LED light and AI powered obstacle recognition.

Ecovacs manages to steer around 18 of 24 objects in our combined test courses. This is above the average score of 16.6, which is good. But Eufy attempts to close the points gap when it avoids 21 out of 24 course objects, a surprising win for Eufy. 

Round 3 Winner: Eufy

That gives the obstacle avoidance round to Eufy with a score of 4.4 to Ecovacs’ 3.8.

Feature / Metric	Ecovacs T30S	Eufy X10 Pro Omni
Obstacle-Avoidance Sensors	Dual laser + 3-D structured light	RGB camera + LED + AI recognition
Objects Avoided (out of 24)	18	21
Obstacle Avoidance Score	3.8 pts	4.4 pts

Round 4: Navigation

Round Four covers navigation. We time how quickly the robots cover our standardized floor plan and also check their coverage. 

Both robots use a top-mounted spinning LiDAR to navigate and map the floor plan.

In our test course, the Ecovacs T30S averaged 0.83 square metres per minute, while the Eufy X10 Pro clocked 0.71 square meters per minute, which is right at the average of .70. 

Round 4 Winner: Ecovacs

Ecovacs T30S covered more ground in less time, so Ecovacs wins the navigation round with 4.4 points to Eufy’s navigation score of 3.5.

Navigation Metric	Ecovacs T30 S	Eufy X10 Pro Omni	Category Average
Top-Mounted LiDAR	Yes	Yes	–
Navigation Speed (m² / min)	0.83	0.71	0.70
Round 4 Score	4.4 pts	3.5 pts	3.75

Round  5: Battery efficiency

In our battery‑efficiency test, the Ecovacs T30S cruised at 1.27 minutes per percent of battery life, a touch below the class average of 1.3, while the Eufy X10 Pro scoots ahead with 1.38 minutes per percent of battery life. 

When we calculate this along with the robot’s runtime, we estimate 1,134 square feet per charge for Ecovacs versus about 1,055 square feet for Eufy—both decent numbers, and ahead of the average of 1,015 square feet per charge.

One last perk on the Ecovacs: the T30S dock supports fast charging, so it recharges quickly between jobs, while Eufy uses a standard charging speed.

Round 5 Winner: Ecovacs

Ecovacs takes round 5. 

Metric	Ecovacs T30S	Eufy X10 Pro Omni	Category Average
Battery-Efficiency Test	1.27 min / %	1.38 min / %	1.30 min / %
Estimated Coverage / Charge	1,134 ft²	1 055 ft²	1 015 ft²
Fast-Charging Dock	Yes	No	–
Battery Scores	2.6 pts	2.4 pts	2.3 pts

Round 6: Pet Features

This round is especially significant for users with pets. While we evaluate every pet‑friendly spec, the hair‑pickup and tangle‑resistance tests carry the most weight.

In the hair-pickup test, we have the robot remove 2.5 inch pet hair from carpet, measuring the hair that the robot was able to remove. Ecovacs lifted 95.5 percent of the flattened pet hair—scoring above the 91.5 percent class average—while Eufy landed right on the average, putting it a step behind Ecovacs.

Both robots have an active hair removal system, but in our 7 inch hair tangle test, the Eufy did very well with zero tangles on its main brush. Ecovacs did not perform as well, with a significant amount of hair tangles, but we suspect that this is because its brush is designed to remove tangles over time. It is possible that it would work better with extended use, but there it is.

Round 6 Winner: Eufy

When we take all of the pet-related features into consideration, the Eufy X10 Pro is the clear winner in this round with 4.1 to Ecovacs’ 3.7.

Metric	Ecovacs T30S	Eufy X10 Pro Omni	Category Avg
Flattened Pet-Hair Pickup	95.5 %	91.5 %	91.5 %
7-in Hair‐Tangle Test	50%	0 %	38 %
Round 6 Score	3.7 pts	4.1 pts	–

Round 7: Performance

Our final round is overall vacuuming performance. Both bots successfully sweep every size of debris from hard floors and carpet. 

We put these bots to the test with our Carpet Deep Clean test, where we embed sand into medium-pile carpet and measure how much the robots are able to remove. 

While Ecovacs posts the higher suction index and a strong airflow number, it removes only 71 percent of embedded sand in the deep‑clean test, which is below the average of 75 percent. Eufy, with technically lower suction and airflow, still managed to pull 83 percent of sand from the carpet.

The Ecovacs T30S performed better on the crevice pickup test than the Eufy X10, scoring closer to average while the Eufy was a little below average, meaning the T30S might be a better pick for floor plans with deep grouts or joints in floors.

Round 7 Winner: Eufy

Eufy, with technically lower suction and airflow bench test scores, still managed to win the round 3.9 to 3.8. Both robots are above average in performance, but the Eufy’s great carpet score pushed it over the tipping point.

Metric / Test	Ecovacs T30S	Eufy X10 Pro Omni	Category Avg
Carpet Deep-Clean (embedded sand)	71 %	83 %	75 %
Suction	1.12	.33	.83
Airflow	25 cfm	15 cfm	16.4 cfm
Round 7 Score	3.8 pts	3.9 pts	3.6 pts

Conclusion

After seven rounds, the Ecovacs T30S finishes first with 26.3 points, and the Eufy X10 Pro scores 24.4. 

This translates to our Vacuum Wars official star ratings at the time of testing of 3.99 stars for the Ecovacs T30S and 3.87 stars for the Eufy X10 Pro. These robots both rank higher than the average Vacuum Wars star rating of 2.8 © Vacuum Wars

Ecovacs claims victories in features, mopping, navigation, and battery. Eufy takes category wins in obstacle avoidance, pet features, and overall performance. 

If higher mopping performance and maintenance matter most, the Ecovacs T30S might be the better pick. 

If you need superior pet features and object avoidance, the Eufy X10 Pro is a great choice. 

Category Wins

Ecovacs T30S	Eufy X10 Pro Omni
Features Mopping Navigation Battery Efficiency	Obstacle Avoidance Pet features Overall Performance